The Masked Morphing of the Chemtrail Cover-up

Friday, May 25th, 2012.

by Zen Gardner

It’s been outright silence and denial concerning the chemtrail phenomenon since they started this insidious program in the early 90′s. While the aerosol spraying is “as plain as the nose on your face”, public discussion has been held off almost entirely so the vast majority would continue to not even notice.

But they’re ever so slowly changing their tune.

While disinformation claiming these chemtrails are simply contrails from increased air traffic seems to have been a workable “dispersant” on public perception, it’s remained buried in obscure articles or internet pages. A very few scientific TV shows have talked about them, but with the usual dismissive conclusions.

Divide, Demonize and Conquer

Usually, those concerned about chemtrails are immediately stigmatized as “conspiracy nuts” and effectively marginalized and lumped together with anything someone might consider a wing-nut. It’s a very effective mental electric fence: “Don’t go there buddy, you’ll be one of them.” And for the self-centered apathetic masses with no backbone or loyalty to truth, it works.

Even more insidious is the fascist control false choice mantra “you’re either with us or you’re with the terrorists”. Very clever, Herr Fascist. But those aren’t the only choices. But it sure works to squelch dissent when enforced by draconian laws such as we have now.

Here’s Wikipedia on false choice or false dilemma:

The logical fallacy of false dilemma (also called false dichotomy, the either-or fallacy) involves a situation in which only two alternatives are considered, when in fact there are other options. Closely related are failing to consider a range of options and the tendency to think in extremes, called black-and-white thinking. Strictly speaking, the prefix “di” in “dilemma” means “two”. When a list of more than two choices is offered, but there are other choices not mentioned, then the fallacy is called the fallacy of false choice, or the fallacy of exhaustive hypotheses.

False dilemma can arise intentionally, when fallacy is used in an attempt to force a choice (“If you are not with us, you are against us.“)

[The phrase "you're either with us, or against us" and similar variations are used to depict situations as being polarized and to force witnesses and bystanders to become allies or lose favor. The implied consequence of not joining the team effort is to be deemed an enemy.]

Are They Responding to our ‘Wake up’?

People are becoming aware of what’s really going on at an exponential rate. It’s apparently reaching critical mass concerning this chemtrail issue, so it appears they’re starting to shift tactics.

Or should I say, “cover their trails”.

It reminds me of the UFO cover up and the lack of ‘disclosure’ by our patronizing governments. That we need some enslaving, parasitic beast called government to acknowledge something before thinking what we see is real is pathetic, we must admit. But practically, if it’s a concern that we need to have mitigated, first it has to be acknowledged and identified. But in today’s totalitarian world we’ve become so powerless it seems that all they need to do is ignore us and simply not answer the question–or even let us publicly ask it.

But the word is getting out. Here’s an ad taken out in a California newspaper:

Hijacking Reality – “Chemtrails don’t exist. But if you see them, here’s what they are…”

What this phenomenon highlights for me is the hijacking of reality by the Powers That Be ultimately via the media, using false science, false education and misinformation–never mind enslaving economics and puppet politics. True information is power and cultivates intelligence spontaneously. False or hidden information cripples and starves a population. Hence today’s dumbed-down society. It’s that simple. (Thanks also to the assault on our bodies through drugged and modified air, water, food and a drug-crazed medical system.)

The One-two Punch: Disinformation and Legitimization through ‘Science’

You might have noticed there have been a few scientific symposiums held to discuss geoengineering in somewhat public forums. While there were (unreported) demonstrations against the meetings and the panels were challenged by attendees knowing the program was already in full swing, they were able to begin to seemingly “legitimize” the subject into the public conscience. Following a similar conference in San Diego, the following took place in northern California just to give you an idea:

Concerns Abound as Geoengineering Conference Opens

Photo: Craig Miller

This week in Monterey, an international group of scientists and policymakers are  are gathering to hash out some ground rules for experimenting with climate intervention, or “geoengineering”–what many are calling “Plan B” for dealing with climate change.

There are two main categories of geoengineering strategies: one focuses on blocking solar radiation that reaches the Earth’s surface, the other aims to remove CO2 from the atmosphere.  The goal of both is to pull an emergency brake on global warming, using technology that is, in many cases, experimental.

Ideas for blocking the sun include science-fiction-sounding ideas like spraying sulfur aerosol into the stratosphere (which we explore in a radio feature on The California Report), launching reflectors into orbit, and spraying seawater at clouds to make them brighter and more reflective.

Because much of the technology remains untested, and because, given the complexities of the climate system there’s no real way to test them out in a lab, (not to mention the philosophical issue of interfering in such a direct way with the Earth), the very idea of geoengineering is controversial (watch this space for more about that in the week ahead) But as it turns out, this week’s conference in Monterey is shaping up to be controversial on its own. (http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2010/03/21/concerns-abound-as-geoengineering-conference-opens/)

‘Simon…(I mean Science) Says…Do This’…

This is how the horrific fluoride scam was proffered. Dress it up in a lab coat.

Very similar to these types of campaigns:

Peter Vereecke: “Those are the so-called Illuminati, the enlightened ones. They are members of secret societies like the Bilderberg group, but are also active in business and global organisations like the United Nations and NATO. It’s not about one certain group but about a type of person with a certain DNA that is common in higher levels of power: people that do not care about the value of human life and are obsessed with power, money and control.

Names, give us a few names.

“Take Al Gore for example. He is member of the illuminati. His message about global warming only has one purpose: money. Because worldwide we will have to pay for the coming measures. That will result in higher taxes and higher food prices and environmental measures in business. That will result in a massive cash-flow. Meanwhile it is confirmed that human activity only accounts for 3% of the global warming.”
They certainly play a role in this because the spray planes are being used more intensively the last few years. You can observe the phenomenon in our country at least 10 days per month.”

No one takes action…

Research for yourself. Decide for yourself.