Subj: [TheEagle-L] Fw: IUFO: HAARP and Psychotronic Control
Date: 1/25/00 4:25:13 AM Pacific Standard Time
From: (Nicky Molloy)
To: (The Eagle Net), (NewsHawk Inc.)

-----Original Message-----
From: Arlene
To: ;
Date: Tuesday, 25 January 2000 07:11
Subject: IUFO: HAARP and Psychotronic Control

-> IUFO Mailing List

Consider ...


Part I

Author Dr. Nick Begich, M.D. Interviewed By Kenneth Burke

> One of the most revealing documents I have found regarding these new
> technologies was produced by the Scientific Advisory Board of the Air
Force. The Air Force initiated a significant study to
> look forward into the next century and see what was possible for new
weapons. In one of the volumes published as a result
> of the study, researchers, scientists and others were encouraged to put
together forecasts of what might be possible in the
> next century. One of those forecasts shockingly revealed the following:
> "One can envision the development of electromagnetic energy sources, the
output of which can be pulsed, shaped, and
> focused, that can couple with the human body in a fashion that will allow
one to prevent voluntary muscular movements,
> control emotions (and thus actions), produce sleep, transmit suggestions,
interfere with both short-term and long-term
> memory, produce an experience set, and delete an experience set.

and ...

From: >

Consider ...

> Related research by Begich and Manning uncovered bizarre schemes.
> example, Air Force documents revealed that a system had been
developed for
> manipulating and disrupting human mental processes through pulsed
> radio-frequency radiation (the stuff of HAARP) over large
> areas. The most telling material about this technology came from
writings of
> Zbigniew Brzezinski (former National Security Advisory to U.S.
> Carter) and J.F. MacDonald (science advisor to U.S. President
Johnson and
> a professor of Geophysics at UCLA), as they wrote about use of
> power-beaming transmitters for geophysical and environmental
warfare. The
> documents showed how these effects might be caused, and the
> effects on human health and thinking.
> The mental-disruption possibilities for HAARP are the most
disturbing. More
> than 40 pages of the book, with dozens of footnotes, chronicle the
work of
> Harvard professors, military planners and scientists as they plan
and test this
> use of the electromagnetic technology. For example, one of the
> describing this use was from the International Red Cross in Geneva.
It even
> gave the frequency ranges where these effects could occur -- the
same ranges
> which HAARP is capable of broadcasting.
> The following statement was made more than twenty-five years ago,
in a
> book by Brzezinski which he wrote while a professor at Columbia
> University:
> "Political strategists are tempted to exploit research on
> brain and human behavior. Geophysicist Gordon J.
> F.MacDonald -- specialist in problems of warfare -- says
> accurately-timed, artificially-excited electronic strokes
> lead to a pattern of oscillations that produce relatively
> power levels over certain regions of the earth...In this
> one could develop a system that would seriously impair the
> brain performance of very large populations in selected
> regions over an extended period'...No matter how deeply
> disturbing the thought of using the environment to
> manipulate behavior for national advantages , to some, the
> technology permitting such use will very probably develop
> within the next few decades."
> In 1966, MacDonald was a member of the President's Science Advisory
> Committee and later a member of the President's Council on
> Quality. He published papers on the use of environmental control
> technologies for military purposes. The most profound comment he
made as a
> geophysicist was, "The key to geophysical warfare is the
identification of
> environmental instabilities to which the addition of a small amount
of energy
> would release vastly greater amounts of energy." While yesterday's
> geophysicists predicted today's advances, are HAARP program
> delivering on the vision?
> The geophysicists recognized that adding energy to the
environmental soup
> could have large effects. However, humankind has already added
> amounts of electromagnetic energy into our environment without
> understanding what might constitute critical mass. The book by
Begich and
> Manning raises questions: Have these additions been without effect,
or is
> there a cumulative amount beyond which irreparable damage can be
done? Is
> HAARP another step in a journey from which we cannot turn back? Are
> about to embark on another energy experiment which unleashes
another set of
> demons from Pandora's box?
> As early as 1970, Zbigniew Brzezinski predicted a "more controlled
> directed society" would gradually appear, linked to technology.
This society
> would be dominated by an elite group which impresses voters by
> superior scientific know-how. Angels Don't Play This HAARP further
> quotes Brzezinski:
> "Unhindered by the restraints of traditional liberal values, this
elite would not
> hesitate to achieve its political ends by using the latest modern
techniques for
> influencing public behavior and keeping society under close
surveillance and
> control. Technical and scientific momentum would then feed on the
> it exploits", Brzezinski predicted.
> His forecasts proved accurate. Today, a number of new tools for the
> are emerging, and the temptation to use them increases steadily.
The policies
> to permit the tools to be used are already in place. How could the
> States be changed, bit by bit, into the predicted highly-controlled
> technosociety? Among the "steppingstones" Brzezinski expected were
> persisting social crises and use of the mass media to gain the
> confidence.
> In another document prepared by the government, the U.S. Air Force
> "The potential applications of artificial electromagnetic
> are wide-ranging and can be used in many military or
> quasi-military situations...Some of these potential uses
> include dealing with terrorist groups, crowd control,
> controlling breaches of security at military installations,
> antipersonnel techniques in tactical warfare. In all of
> cases the EM (electromagnetic) systems would be used to
> produce mild to severe physiological disruption or
> distortion or disorientation. In addition, the ability of
> individuals to function could be degraded to such a point
> they would be combat ineffective. Another advantage of
> electromagnetic systems is that they can provide coverage
> over large areas with a single system. They are silent and
> countermeasures to them may be difficult to develop... One
> last area where electromagnetic radiation may prove of some
> value is in enhancing abilities of individuals for anomalous
> phenomena."
> Do these comments point to uses already somewhat developed? The
author of
> the government report refers to an earlier Air Force document about
the uses
> of radiofrequency radiation in combat situations. (Here Begich and
> note that HAARP is the most versatile and the largest
> radio-frequency-radiation transmitter in the world.)
> The United States Congressional record deals with the use of HAARP
> penetrating the earth with signals bounced off of the ionosphere.
> signals are used to look inside the planet to a depth of many
kilometers in
> order to locate underground munitions, minerals and tunnels. The
> Senate set aside $15 million dollars in 1996 to develop this
ability alone --
> earth-penetrating-tomography. The problem is that the frequency
needed for
> earth-penetrating radiations is within the frequency range most
cited for
> disruption of human mental functions. It may also have profound
effects on
> migration patterns of fish and wild animals which rely on an
> energy field to find their routes.

Now, is anyone able to explain to me why blanket technology such as
HAARP is not connected to the proliferation of microwave towers under
the auspices of cell phone coverage.

Does anyone else suspect the cell phone wave...

What better way than to covertly erect microwave towers to
blanketly transmit radio frequency radiation that affects our brain
functioning than to do it under cover of a proliferation of CELL PHONE
towers so that we may have better service and coverage?

If there were no cell phones people would become VERY suspect of the
erection of these towers. But we have been seduced into thinking we
are technologically 'challenged' if we do not use cell phones. At the
same time we have been skillfully manipulated into DEMANDING that we
have a tower on every corner so that we have full blanket coverage and
service everywhere.

We have, in essence, DEMANDED the proliferation of transmission

And could it be that it is not about the microwave radiation being
beamed through cell phones to disrupt our brain functioning (although
such could certainly be the case) but that the microwave radiation is
being beamed into the air from every tower and hill top on the planet ...

Is this feasible ? Any thoughts out there ...