How Terahertz Waves Tear Apart DNA
A new model of the way the THz waves
interact with DNA explains how the damage is done and why evidence has been so
hard to gather
Friday, October 30, 2009
Great things are expected of
terahertz waves, the radiation that fills the slot in the electromagnetic
spectrum between microwaves and the infrared. Terahertz waves pass through
non-conducting materials such as clothes , paper, wood and brick and so cameras
sensitive to them can peer inside envelopes, into living rooms and
"frisk" people at distance.
The way terahertz waves are absorbed
and emitted can also be used to determine the chemical composition of a
material. And even though they don't travel far inside the body, there is great
hope that the waves can be used to spot tumours near the surface of the skin.
With all that potential, it's no
wonder that research on terahertz waves has exploded in the last ten years or
so.
But what of the health effects of
terahertz waves? At first glance, it's easy to dismiss any notion that they can
be damaging. Terahertz photons are not energetic enough to break chemical bonds
or ionise atoms or molecules, the chief reasons why higher energy photons such
as x-rays and UV rays are so bad for us. But could there be another mechanism
at work?
The evidence that terahertz
radiation damages biological systems is mixed. "Some studies reported
significant genetic damage while others, although similar, showed none,"
say Boian Alexandrov at the Center for Nonlinear Studies at Los Alamos National
Laboratory in New Mexico and a few buddies. Now these guys think they know why.
Alexandrov and co have created a
model to investigate how THz fields interact with double-stranded DNA and what
they've found is remarkable. They say that although the forces generated are
tiny, resonant effects allow THz waves to unzip double-stranded DNA, creating
bubbles in the double strand that could significantly interfere with processes
such as gene expression and DNA replication. That's a jaw dropping conclusion.
And it also explains why the
evidence has been so hard to garner. Ordinary resonant effects are not powerful
enough to do do this kind of damage but nonlinear resonances can. These
nonlinear instabilities are much less likely to form which explains why the
character of THz genotoxic
effects are probabilistic rather than deterministic, say the team.
This should set the cat among the
pigeons. Of course, terahertz waves are a natural part of environment, just
like visible and infrared light. But a new generation of cameras are set to
appear that not only record terahertz waves but also bombard us with them. And
if our exposure is set to increase, the question that urgently needs answering
is what level of terahertz exposure is safe.
Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0910.5294:DNA Breathing Dynamics in the Presence of a Terahertz Field
The following has been
circulating for years now in certain on-line "communities".
Run by any
physicist/engineer knowledgable in EM effects
OPERATION
What I am talking about is kind of like radar. The orbiting phased array sends
out a signal, then picks up and sorts out the return signal and then determines
that what they have is a human target. The same "radar beam" ( it is
GHZ or terahertz so it is not actually radar) fires neurons, probes your mind
etc to determine exactly WHO the target is and does the mind assault activity,
(v2K, pain-center ,image-to-consciousness ITC etc.)
Let us assume they
have the signal on a target. So signals are being directed from the satellite
or remote stations to the targets. [ Since it is phased array they can track
thousands of targets simultaneously. One pencil thin beam per target. Now , the original
technology, upon which I am envision this to be based, was designed to track
hundreds of incoming warheads each traveling at about 22,000 mph.. So tracking thousands
of humans who can travel no more than 650 mph when flying in a commercial
airline, is a comparative piece of cake!]
These signals hit the
( a) target interact with the tissue cells etc. of the target, and then the frequencies
and amplitudes that constitute the incoming signals are altered. This altered
incoming signal now becomes the outgoing signal to be detected by the SQUID
detectors on the satellite/remote detectors.
From the rapid
computer processing and comparison of sent signal to received signal, it can be
deduced which tissue are we examining here which neurons are we examining here. So they ( or the
ground based computer) says " We have neurons in the auditory cortex"
The beam is then rapidly intensified, either by increasing the focus and or the
power .
Now there is a
phenomenon of physics where if a laser or maser beam is intensified it produces
a strong local electric field in the immediate vicinity of the beam. . [See
Physics Today, Jan. 1990 pg 22-28 for a ultrahigh intensity application of this
principle] This electric field would be strong enough to open or close sodium
channels on the neuron
tree by causing it to fire on not fire depending on the neuron or synapse
conditions.
If done with the
correct sequence in both time and space you will interpret these excited
auditory neurons as; V2K!
"Goal accomplished " they would say.
" Violation of my
rights and person", you would say. " I am taking this to the FBI, the
Supreme Court, to the Hague, to the Congressional Oversites persons who are
supposed to be protecting my rights!" ( Right? But these folks are all on
the "payroll" and/or under duress)
And they continue
monitoring the return signals to deduce your
'thoughts".
Don't think terahetrz
waves are capable of seeing such details from a distance of hundreds of miles?
SEarch-engine this on
the net:
U.S. troops take part
X-Band radar test
By John Vandiver
Stars and Stripes
European edition,
"About 100 Europe-based
troops continue to operate the X-Band radar, .....EUCOM stated. The system is
reportedly capable of tracking a baseball-size object from a distance of 2,900
miles."
2009 Stars and
Stripes. All Rights Reserved.
http://www.stripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=61999
Source:
http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/24331/
The technology I speak
of that used to track incoming warheads has been publicly stated to be able to
track a golf-ball over Seattle staying in Washington DC. That is 2470 miles.
Assume the satellites/
remote sensors are 120 miles up (or away) 2470/120 = 20.6 on a calculator.
A golf ball has a
diameter of 4.26 cm 42.6 mm.
Move the golf ball to
only 120 miles away you would expect the technology to "see" an even
lateral distance even smaller than a golf ball..
So at 120 miles what
lateral measurement will give that same ratio of 20.6? That measurement is
2.1mm
42.6/2.1 = 20.6
golf ball/ 2.1mm =
20.6 the same 20.6
Then since we are
using radiation of very small wavelength,
1/millionth of a meter divide this by a factor of 10 -100 say. So we get a
distance of .02 mm. The average neuron is about .1mm.
So some rough
calculations gives that the stated technology has the resolution to pick out
neurons from 120 miles up !
Much less people. That
is how good the technology is.
Source: http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=159354