If you did not enjoy "traditional" chemtrails raining down on you, you
are not going to like the new version, which the United States Air Force
promises will feature aerial dumps of programmable "smart" molecules tens
of thousands of times smaller than the particles already landing people in
emergency rooms with respiratory, heart and gastrointestinal complaints.
Under development since 1995, the military's goal is to install
microprocessors incorporating gigaflops computer capability into "smart
particles" the size of a single molecule.
Invisible except under
the magnification of powerful microscopes, these nano-size
radio-controlled chips are now being made out of mono-atomic gold
particles. Networked together on the ground or assembling in the air,
thousands of sensors will link into a single supercomputer no larger than
a grain of sand.
Brought to you by the same
military-corporate-banking complex that runs America's permanent wars,
Raytheon Corp is already profiting from new weather warfare technologies.
The world's fourth largest military weapons maker bought E-Systems in
1995, just one year after that military contractor bought APTI, holder of
Bernard Eastlund's HAARP patents.
Raytheon also owns General
Dynamics, the world's leading manufacturer of military Unmanned Aerial
Raytheon also reports the weather for NOAA through its
Advanced Weather Information Processing System. According to researcher
Brendan Bombaci of Durango, Colorado, these Raytheon computers are directy
linked with their UAV weather modification drones. Bombaci reports that
NOAA paid Raytheon more than $300 million for this "currently active,
She goes on to describe the Joint Environmental
Toolkit used by the U.S. Air Force in its Weather Weapons System. Just the
thing for planet tinkerers.
consumption, nano-weather control jargon has been sanitized.
"Microelectric Mechanical Sensors" (MMS) and "Global Environmental
Mechanical Sensors" sound passively benign. But these ultra-tiny
autonomous aerial vehicles are neither M&Ms nor gems. [Space.com Oct
According to a U.S. military flier called Military Progress,
"The green light has been given" to disperse swarms of
wirelessly-networked nano-bots into the troposphere by remotely-controlled
UAV drones for "global warming mitigation."
U.S. Army Tactical
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, as well as U.S. Air Force drones "are slated to
deploy various payloads for weather warfare," Military Progress asserts.
This dual mission - to slow global warming and use weather as a weapon -
seems somewhat contradictory.
FIGHTING FOR CLIMATE
U.S. Military Inc. is already in the climate change business big
time. The single biggest burner of petroleum on this planet, its
high-flying aircraft routinely rend Earth's protective radiation shielding
with nitrous oxide emissions, while depositing megatons of additional
carbon, sulfur and water particles directly into the stratosphere - where
they will do three-times more damage than CO2 alone.
Go figure. A
single F-15 burns around 1,580 gallons an hour. An Apache gunship gets
about one-half mile to the gallon. The 1,838 Abrams tanks in Iraq achieve
five gallons to the mile, while firing dusty radioactive shells that will
continue destroying human DNA until our sun goes supernova.
single non-nuclear carrier steaming in support burns 5,600 gallons of
bunker fuel in an hour - or two million gallons of bunker oil every 14
days. Every four days, each carrier at sea takes on another half- million
gallons of fuel to supply its jets.
The U.S. Air Force consumed
nearly half of the Department of Defense's entire fuel supply in 2006,
burning 2.6 billion gallons of jet fuel aloft.
While flying two to
five-hour chemtrails missions to reflect incoming sunlight and slow global
warming, a single KC-10 tanker will burn 2,050 gallons of highly toxic jet
fuel every hour. The larger and older KC-135 Stratotanker carries 31,275
gallons of chemtrails and burns 2,650 gallons of fuel per hour.
The EPA says that each gallon of gasoline produces 19.4 pounds of
CO2. Each gallon of diesel produces 22.2 pounds of CO2.
up and routine operations by a military bigger than all other world
militaries combined puts more than 48 billion tons of carbon dioxide into
the atmosphere every year. Nearly half that total could be eliminated by
ending the wars against Iraq and Afghanistan. [TomDispatch.com June 16/07;
huffingtonpost.com Oct 29/07]
Meanwhile, the 60
year quest for weather warfare continues. Though a drone cannot carry a
heavy payload, more sub-microscopic weather modification particles can be
crammed into a UAV Predator than all the chemtrail slurry packed into a
tanker the size of a DC-10. T
According to the air force's own
weather modification study, Owning The Weather 2025, clouds of
these extremely teeny machines will be dropped into hurricanes and other
weather systems to blend with storms and report real time weather data to
each other and a larger sensor network.
Then these smart particles
will be used to increase or decrease the storm's size and intensity - and
"steer" it to "specific targets".
The air force report boasted
that nano-chemtrails "will be able to adjust their size to optimal
dimensions for a given seeding situation and make adjustments throughout
the process." Instead of being sprayed into the air at the mercy of the
winds aloft, as is the fate of normal chemtrails, nano versions will be
able to "enhance their dispersal" by "adjusting their atmospheric
buoyancy" and "communicating with each other" as they steer themselves in
a single coordinated flock within their own artificial cloud.
Nano-chemtrails will even "change their temperature and polarity
to improve their seeding effects," the air force noted. [Daily Texan July
Rutgers University scientist J. Storrs Hall held out the
military's hope that these new nano weather-warrior bots: "Interconnected,
atmospherically buoyant, and having navigation capability in three
dimensions - clouds of microscopic computer particles communicating with
each other and with a control system, could provide tremendous
It is potentially relatively inexpensive to do," Hall clarified. "About the
same price per pound as potatoes."
Why so cheap? Because nano
particles can be potentially self-replicating. That is, they can be made
to reproduce themselves until programmed to stop.
Owning The Weather goes
on to say that the USAF will "manage and employ a weather-modification
capability by the Weather Force Support Element." These weather forces
will use real-time updates from swarms of the nano-size "smart sensors" to
model developing weather patterns with a super-duper
Based on continually updated forecast, the weather
warriors will fly follow-on missions as needed to tweak the storm. It's
perfect, crows the air force. "The total weather-modification process
becomes "a real-time loop of continuous, appropriate, measured
interventions, and feedback capable of producing desired weather
Weather modification did not work too
well with Katrina.
If the notion of inserting Autonomous
Intelligence nanobots into weather systems to monitor, steer and mess with
them seems risky, just wait. Around the next cloud corner are coming
swarms of airborne nano-bots to optimize wind dispersal patterns for germ
warfare. Or chemtrails.
But there's one small hitch. Nobody knows
how Earth's atmosphere works. It is so big, so complex and so
unpredictable, even real-time nano-snapshots are ancient history as soon
as they are taken.
This is why the air force said, "Advances in
the science of chaos are critical to this endeavor."
After a decade of trying, not even a 48-hour weather forecast can be made
without constant surprises.
Because they cannot be graphed in a
cause-and-effect straight line, chaotic "non-linear" weather processes can
morph unexpectedly, defying predicted weather modification inputs. Just
Then there's the matter of accidental genocide. I
mean human health.
The chemtrails we are too
familiar with after a decade-long dose continue to inflict eye infections,
nosebleeds, skin sores, muscle pain, chronic exhaustion, weakened
immunity, acute asthma and allergies, short-term memory loss and heart
attacks on people in more than a dozen countries. [americanskywatch.com;
Chemtrails Confirmed 2008 by William Thomas]
like the aluminum oxide found in chemtrails also kill.
Woodard calls aluminum oxide a "nuisance dust". This MD says that
prolonged exposures to very high concentrations of particulates that are
visible in the air "can produce pulmonary fibrosis, somewhat like the
silicosis formerly seen in miners."
"At one time it was thought to
precipitate Alzheimer's disease, but more recent research has shown it is
almost certainly unrelated," Dr. Woodward adds.
It's the tiny size
of chemtrail fallout - one-tenth the width of the human hair - that make
people very ill. The EPA warns that there is a strong link between all
tiny particles and thousands of premature deaths each year.
key studies from the early 1990's by the Harvard School of Public Health
and the American Cancer Society found strong links between high levels of
small particles and a rise in death rates. In an article headlined, "Tiny
Particles Can Kill" the August 5, 2000 issue of New Scientist
pointed to findings in six cities over 16 years showing that
"city-dwellers in Europe and the U.S. are dying young because of
microscopic particles in the air."
According to the New York
Times, "microscopic motes… are able to infiltrate the tiniest
compartments in the lungs and pass readily into the bloodstream."
Particles in the size range called for by the Welsbach Patent describing
chemtrails are "most strongly tied to illness and early death,
particularly in people who are already susceptible to respiratory
problems." [New York Times Oct 14/06]
The Welsbach Patent calls for
megatons of 10 micron-size aluminum oxide particles to be spread in the
atmosphere. The EPA calls particles this small "an extreme human health
hazard" leading to 5% increased death rate within 24 hrs.
as well as lungs can be damaged by ultra-fine particles small enough to
get into the bloodstream and inflame tissues and cells," reports the
LA Times. "After they reach the heart, the particles are thought
to cause a stress reaction in cells, producing inflammation that
contributes to heart disease. The particles also may cause blood clots."
[Los Angeles Times Dec 29/03]
The Neurotoxicology (brain poisoning)
division of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency says that exposure to
airborne Particulate Matter "is an environmental health risk of global
proportions." [Health Risks Of Aerosoled Particulates PubMed
The EPA explains that by penetrating deep into the lungs
and circulatory system, these dust-size particles "are implicated in tens
of thousands of deaths annually from both respiratory and coronary
POP QUIZ: What do you think will happen when nano-size
machines tens of thousands of times smaller than this are sprayed into the
"SMART PARTICLES" IN YOUR BRAIN MAKE YOU DEAD
Nanoparticles might better be called Nastyparticles because they make
a beeline for the brain as soon as they are inhaled. Not surprisingly,
they tend to accumulate and clump in the area of the brain that deals with
smell. Too big to pass back through the blood-brain barrier, they become
trapped there. [Nature.com Jan 5/04]
Dr. Celine Filippi also
observed that nanoparticles inhaled into the lungs are so mall they easily
cross the lung barrier and enter the blood. "Particles in the blood can
reach the liver, amongst other organs." [globalresearch.ca Oct 21/07]
So are we being sprayed with
Owning The Weather 2025 was published in
1995 and discussed only non-classified military weather modification
projects. Hall's Overview of Nanotechnology also appeared in 1995, when
nanotech was in its Frankenstein infancy. Since then, many sources tell
us, nanotech has gone exponential. [nanotech-now.com]
The term "nano-chemtrails" on my homepage prompted my trusted
military informant I've dubbed "Hank" to call.
"They have them,"
he confirmed. The U.S. Air Force has occasionally added nanoparticles to
the chemtrail mix to demonstrate proof of concept.
beyond science fiction," Hank confirmed. "You can hide just about anything
you want in a chemtrail - including nanotubes. Chemtrails are being
altered for whatever spectrum of wavelength they're trying to bounce off
about Morgellons? Is there any connection between this bizarre and
frightening malady and nano experiments?
"You're not going to like
this," Hank said. "Morgellons is one unintended manifestation of nano
Morgellons manifests - or presents" - as
intolerable itching in the skin followed by alien eruptions of thin hairs
or tendrils through the skin. "It's basically the same as excreting
something through a hair follicle," Hank said.
He meant a toxin -
something foreign to the body.
"If you manufacture a liquid
super-cyrstalline structure, vibrate it a little and give it an electrical
charge - it will form into a chain."
These nanotubes will be
invisible to the eye, of course. But their tendency to clump together
could eventually make them big enough to be photographed and posted on the
How much nanocrap has been sprayed so far?
"Tens of tons," he replied.
Tens of tons of molecules?
"Much of it is still up there,"
Hank went on to explain. This is because nanoparticles are so light and
small they tend bind to bind with oxygen molecules. And piggybacking on
oxygen particles makes them buoyant.
"It travels worldwide," Hank
continued. "Some of it comes down. Whatever it's exposed to up there it
brings down here. We get exposed to it. We breathe it in, we ingest it. It
accrues in the same spot every time. And attracts more of it… "
"The fallout would look like a prion
disease," Hank said.
"Fallout from nanoparticles would eat holes
in our brains?"
"Pretty much. Nano particles are ionized particles
that go to what attracts them…. Because of their electro-chemical
properties, they are attracted to the potassium-calcium channel in the
Think about it, he said. "If they are capable of
withstanding the corrosive upper atmosphere - corrosive sunlight and all
those (industrial) chemicals - what would they have to be manufactured out
of? Does the body manufacture anything that can deal with that? Who will
come forward and say these are good?
"A person shall not discharge from any source
whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which
cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number
of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health
or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a
natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property.
-EPA Air Quality Management Rule 402.