HAARP Transmissions May
Accidentally be Jamming Bees Homing Ability, June 1, 2007
By Guy Cramer
PART 1
Beginning
in the Summer of 2006, bee hives in more than half the U.S. States, Four
Canadian Provinces and a number of Countries in Europe have mysteriously been
losing billions of bees in what is now being termed Colony
Collapse Disorder, Canadian officials have yet to declare their bee losses are
due to this disorder. Essentially the mature worker bees leave the hive and do
not return leaving the Queen and immature workers unable to sustain the hive.
Due to the recent outbreak and distances involved in the regions affected most
researchers are unable to explain why this is occurring. Currently one theory
suggests the electromagnetic waves may be causing interference with bees’
navigation as previous small scale research showed that 70% of the bees did not
return to the hive when cordless phone transmitters placed within the colonies.
Here we show that a U.S. military radio transmitter (ionospheric
heater) array, the most powerful in the world, transitioned to full power in
2006 and reception of signals transmitted cover the same region as the Colony
Collapse Disorder. The High-frequency Active Auroral
Research Project is an antenna array located in Alaska. It a congressionally initiated
program jointly managed by the U.S. Air Force and U.S. Navy. The Array has been
used to conduct numerous ionospheric and radio wave
propagation research studies over the past decade. One project study conducted
in 1997 showed the radio transmission range was only received in North America and Europe. This Array transitioned to full
power and military use just prior to the summer of 2006 with an increase in
output from 9.6 kilowatts to 3.6 megawatts. The corresponding timing and range
with the Colony Collapse Disorder suggests recent
transmissions from the array could be the most likely cause of the bee problem.
These past few months a
number of research groups confirmed that Bee Populations have dropped
dramatically within the past year in North America and Europe. This mystery is now being referred to as Colony
Collapse Disorder (CCD). The CCD term is used when a hive's worker bees don’t
return to the hive, it is thought they are becoming disoriented and unable to
navigate back – only to die from the cold. The hive’s remaining semi permanent
bees such as the Queen and immature workers cannot sustain themselves.
The problem was first noted last
summer; however, over half of all American states have reported CCD and only 40
percent of the commercial hives on the West Coast and 30 percent of the hives
on the East Coast remain intact. The problem has also been confirmed in
numerous European countries1,2 and Canadian bee keepers
in British Columbia, Alberta,
Saskatchewan and Ontario are also reporting suspicious
losses in the bee populations but the Canadian
Officials are not yet prepared to say it is due to CCD. 3
The theory has been put forward
that Cellular Phones are to blame as a number of studies in Germany showed that
70% of bees will not return to a hive if a cellular phone is close to the hive,
the initial article reporting the cellular phone connection incorrectly
reported the study which actually place base
stations from cordless phone sets into the colonies,
cellular phones were not used in this study. This small scale study indicated
that the electromagnetics from the mobile
transmitters are interfering with the bee’s sensitive navigational ability.4
“Roughly a third of the U.S. diet is pollinated by honey bees, making their approximate
economic value $15 billion in the U.S.” 5
A couple of problems with this
cordless phone transmission / bee interference hypothesis: A) Why did this problem occur only within the past year as
cordless phones have been used for many years. B) Why has the CCD problem only
seriously affecting North America and Europe?
The cordless phone base
experiments that indicate interference with bees
ability to return to the hive is useful evidence but this in and of itself does
not prove their theory. However, we may be able to ascertain from this that
some mode of radio transmissions may be affecting the bees, but it would only
be transmissions which are located within North America and Europe and the transmissions must be something
new within the past year.
The HAARP complex (High-frequency Active Auroral Research Project) is a congressionally initiated
program jointly managed by the U.S. Air Force and U.S. Navy. HAARP is situated
within a 23-acre lot in a relatively isolated region near the town of Gakona, Alaska. It consists of 180 towers, 72 feet in height,
forming a "high-power, high frequency phased array radio transmitter"
capable of beaming in the 2.5-10 megahertz frequency range, at more than 3
megawatts of power (3 million watts). This array is the most powerful in the
world and is used in conjunction with at least one other powerful array in Alaska - HIPAS [HIgh Power Auroral Stimulation] used to steer the HAARP signal.
A few of the Military
applications of HAARP as disclosed by the military include but are not limited
to: submarine communication, long-range ground penetration radar and over the
horizon radar.
In 1997 HAARP was used for
transmission testing to see how far the signals would travel, this was long
before the array was at full power, the results of amateur radio reception of
the HAARP signal showed excellent reception down the west coast of British
Columbia, Canada to California, the Midwest was weaker with Texas somewhat
stronger than the Midwest due to “favorable propagation paths”. The East Coast
received weak signals with patchy reception due to the signal having to travel
through the auroral zone (this is the region we
typically see the north lights or aurora at night time)
In Europe the signal was
weak but enough to copy the Morse code due to reflection from ionosphere
patches within the polar auroral circle, this allowed
the people in Europe to get a better signal than those on the East coast of the
U.S. Hawaii picked up one of the strongest receptions and New Zealand couldn’t get
the signal as they were still in the sunlight and the conditions do not allow
the signal to propagate into sunlight regions.
“The HAARP
transmitter is limited to frequencies below 10 Mhz.
Frequencies in this range are affected by absorption in the D layer of the
ionosphere which disappears at night. Conversely, ionization in the reflective
F layer would be expected to be high for several hours after sunset permitting skywave propagation (bouncing signals off high altitude
ionosphere layers for long distance reception) at the 6.99 Mhz frequency.”
The test concluded that HAARP High Frequency transmissions can be detected in Canada, U.S. and Europe. It just so happens that the mysterious
CCD problem seems to be taking place within the same region!
HAARP
transitioned just prior to the Summer of 2006 to full power from 960 kW
(kilowatts) to 3.6 mW (megawatts) which is an
increase of almost 4 times the output and the technology was moved from DARPA
control to full joint U.S. Navy and U.S. Air Force operation as of Fiscal Year
2006. 6
CCD by most
accounts began in the summer of 2006, some reports
suggest that it may have been occurring in a limited scale for the previous few
years. This corresponds with HAARP going to full power in 2006 and transmitting
at 27% power output prior to this.
Considering
HAARP is not only used for High Frequency (HF) military and intelligence signal
transmission but also Low Frequency (LF) and Extremely Low Frequency (ELF)
transmission for Submarine communications and the ability for the array to heat
a region of the ionosphere producing a denser region to bounce even higher
frequency signals back to earth which would normally penetrate the ionosphere.
Finding the precise cause for interference with bees’ navigational ability from
the operational frequency spectrum of HAARP may be difficult.
There could also
be another factor HAARP is also able to stimulate the ionosphere to trigger faint optical
emissions at specific wavelengths to produce artificial airglow at high altitude.
Initially these tests involved producing this airglow bubble above HAARP but
they discovered with testing that they could direct the airglow to follow the
magnetic lines of the Earth.7
These HAARP
triggered airglow wavelengths fall within the range of Bee’s visual spectrum.
Evidence suggests that bees probably use their wide visual spectrum to lock
onto the sun to allow them to find their way back to the hive and communicate
to other worker bees how to get to locations they just came from, it was thought
that ultraviolet emissions from the sun were primary positioning system for the
bees as it penetrates cloud cover. However, tests on bees many years ago Edrich, Neumeyer & von Helversen
(1979) and van der Glas
(1977) have shown that the longer Infrared
wavelengths also influence the bees orientation.
8
The HAARP
induced airglow falls within this same Infrared wavelength of 630 nm which can
be detected by bees but it is not visible to the human eye. One reason for
HAARP to trigger this high altitude airglow is for a one way communications
system, the airglow can be influenced to pulse and the optical intensity
differences can be deciphered by sensitive equipment, the delay is a few
seconds so it takes awhile to send a message in this optical format. 9
Another experiment in the
Netherlands testing greenhouse materials on bee orientation due to the changes
of natural light frequencies passing through the material concluded that
beneath the claddings with glass or polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) many bees
returned to the hives whereas bees in a greenhouse with polycarbonate (PC)
cladding rarely returned to the hive. 10 The evidence suggests the something in the PC varied the light passing
through the material within the greenhouse which in turn disoriented the bees.
Conclusion: Large
Scale CCD began in the summer of 2006, HAARP went to
full power in the summer of 2006. Initial research shows bees are sensitive to electromagnetics and/or specific frequencies outside of the
visual spectrum, HAARP transmits over a broad range of
frequencies. Bees are sensitive to changes in the visual spectrum. HAARP can
induce changes in the same visual spectrum that bees utilize. CCD is taking
place in a limited regional locations of North American and Europe, HAARP testing has shown the greatest reception of
their transmissions are within North
America and Europe.
While we cannot determine if
it is a particular radio frequency, optical transmission, optical frequency or
electromagnetic signal associated with the HAARP transmissions which may be
interfering with the bees at this point, the evidence is suggestive of further
required research to narrow down potential interference frequencies and
phenomena.
References:
1)
HONEY BEE DIE-OFF ALARMS
BEEKEEPERS, CROP GROWERS AND RESEARCHERS, January
29 , 2007 Writer/Editor, Chuck Gill http://www.aginfo.psu.edu/News/07Jan/HoneyBees.htm
2)
The mysterious deaths
of the honeybees March 29 2007: 5:28 PM EDT By CNN's
Amy Sahba http://money.cnn.com/2007/03/29/news/honeybees/
3)
Apiarists buzzing about soaring rate of honeybee deaths April 2, 2007
at 4:26 AM EDT By JOHN PARTRIDGE http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070402.wxbees02/BNStory/Science/home
4)
Cellphone researchers claim data
misinterpreted Tuesday, 24
April 2007 Written by ColonyCollapse.org http://colonycollapse.org/content/view/23/33/
5)
The local buzz:
Beekeepers across North of Boston swarm to open hives for the season April
20, 2007 12:00 am Emily Young http://www.newburyportnews.com/pulife/local_story_110094004?keyword=secondarystory
6)
RDT&E
BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) unclassified, February 2006
http://www.dtic.mil/descriptivesum/Y2007/DARPA/0603287E.pdf
7)
Naval Research
Laboratory; The High Frequency Active Auroral
Research Program E.J. Kennedy, P. Rodriguez, and C.A.
Selcher Information Technology Division
http://www.nrl.navy.mil/content.php?P=04REVIEW106
8) SKYLIGHT POLARIZATION PATTERNS AND ANIMAL
ORIENTATION BY MICHAEL L. BRINES The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10021 AND JAMES L. GOULD Department of
Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 April 3, 1981
http://jeb.biologists.org/cgi/reprint/96/1/69.pdf
9) E-Mail to HAARP http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/ltr/ltr5.html
10) Bee orientation
under new energy saving greenhouse claddings On-line version, last update 20
January 2007, Tjeerd Blacquière, Bram Cornelissen , Jeroen
Donders PPO Bee Unit, Wageningen University & Research,
Wageningen,The Netherlands P.10 http://www.eurbee.org/Files/Sbornik%20EurBee%20pro%20web250107.doc
PART 2
In Part 1 I showed the correlation
between Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD) and the transition to full power of the
High-frequency Active Auroral Research Project
(HAARP) in 2006.
In Part 2 I will review previous
research which goes in-depth on a number of past studies on the effects of
electromagnetic interference on bees and I will also review key areas the
patent HAARP is based upon. This background should provide further support of
the findings that CCD may be directly related to increased HAARP activity.
In August 2002 the following release
was issued: Russian parliament concerned about US plans to develop new
weapon
[FBIS Transcribed Text] MOSCOW. Aug 8 (Interfax) - The Russian State Duma
has expressed concern about the United
States' program to develop a qualitatively
new type of weapon.
"Under the High Frequency Active Auroral
Research Program (HAARP), the U.S. is creating
new integral geophysical weapons that may influence the near-Earth medium with
high-frequency radio waves," the State Duma said
in an appeal circulated on Thursday.
"The significance of this qualitative leap could be compared
to the transition from cold steel to fire arms, or from conventional weapons to
nuclear weapons. This new type of weapons differs from previous types in that
the near-Earth medium becomes at once an object of direct influence and its
component.
These conclusions were made by the commission of the State Duma's international affairs and defense committees, the
statement reads.
The committees reported that the U.S. is planning
to test three facilities of this kind. One of them is located on the military
testing ground in Alaska and its
full-scale tests are to begin in early 2003. The second one is in Greenland and the
third one in Norway.
"When these facilities are launched into space from Norway, Alsaka and Greenland, a closed
contour will be created with a truly fantastic integral potential for
influencing the near-Earth medium," the State Duma
said.
The U.S. plans to carry out large-scale scientific experiments,
under the HAARP program, and not controlled by the global community, will
create weapons capable of breaking radio communication lines and equipment
installed on spaceships and rockets, provoke serious accidents in electricity
networks and in oil and gas pipelines and have a negative impact on the mental
health of people populating entire regions, the deputies said.
They demanded that an international ban be put on such large-scale
geophysical experiments.
The appeal, signed by 90 deputies, has been sent to President
Vladimir Putin, to the United Nations and other
international organizations, to the parliaments and leaders of the UN member
countries, to the scientific public and to mass media outlets.
Among those who signed the appeal are Tatyana
Astrakhankina, Nikolai Kharitonov,
Yegor Ligachev, Sergei Reshulsky, Vitaly Sevastyanov, Viktor Cherepkov, Valentin Zorkaltsev and Alexei
Mitrofanov.1
I've pulled out a few paragraphs below
from the patent; If HAARP can disrupt communications
in the atmosphere, on the surface and sea communication (both surface and
subsurface) and be able to disrupt the guidance systems of the most
sophisticated aircraft and missiles. It is not a stretch to connect it to
disruption of bee guidance.
United States Patent
#4,686,605 Inventor: Eastlund; Bernard J.
Method and apparatus for altering a region in the earth's atmosphere,
ionosphere, and/or magnetosphere
"Likewise, if the density N.sub.e is on the order of 10.sup.8, a properly positioned
plume will provide a reflecting surface for VHF waves and can be used to
enhance, interfere with, or otherwise modify
communication transmissions. It can be seen from the foregoing that by
appropriate application of various aspects of this invention at strategic
locations and with adequate power sources, a means and method is provided to
cause interference with or even total disruption of communications over a very
large portion of the earth. This
invention could be employed to disrupt not only land based communications, both
civilian and military, but also airborne communications and sea communications
(both surface and subsurface). This would have significant military
implications, particularly as a barrier to or confusing factor for hostile
missiles or airplanes. The belt or belts of enhanced ionization
produced by the method and apparatus of this invention, particularly if set up
over Northern Alaska and Canada, could be
employed as an early warning device, as well as a communications disruption
medium. Further, the simple ability to produce such a situation in a practical
time period can by itself be a deterring force to
hostile action."
..."a substantial amount of
randomly modulated signals of very large power magnitude can be generated in a
highly nonlinear mode. This can cause
confusion of or interference with or even complete disruption of guidance
systems employed by even the most sophisticated of airplanes and missiles.
The ability to employ and transmit over very wide areas of the earth a
plurality of electromagnetic waves of varying frequencies and to change same at
will in a random manner, provides a
unique ability to interfere with all modes of communications, land, sea, and/or
air, at the same time. Because of the unique juxtaposition of
usable fuel source at the point where desirable field lines intersect the
earth's surface, such wide ranging and complete communication interference can
be achieved in a resonably short period of time.
Because of the mirroring phenomenon discussed hereinabove, it can also be prolonged for substantial time periods so that it
would not be a mere transient effect that could simply be waited out by an
opposing force. Thus, this invention provides the ability to
put unprecedented amounts of power in the earth's atmosphere at strategic
locations and to maintain the power injection level, particularly if random
pulsing is employed, in a manner far more precise and better controlled than
heretofore accomplished by the prior art,"...
This paragraph is his future use
observation at the end of the patent (lifting the atmosphere will have direct
influence on surface ion ratios):
This
invention has a phenomenal variety of possible ramifications and potential
future developments. As alluded to earlier, missile or aircraft destruction, deflection, or
confusion could result, particularly when relativistic particles are employed.
Also, large regions of the atmosphere
could be lifted to an unexpectedly high altitude so that missiles encounter
unexpected and unplanned drag forces with resultant destruction or deflection
of same. Weather
modification is possible by, for example, altering upper atmosphere wind
patterns or altering solar absorption patterns by constructing one or more
plumes of atmospheric particles which will act as a lens or focusing device.
Also as alluded to earlier, molecular modifications of the atmosphere can take
place so that positive environmental
effects can be achieved. Besides actually changing the
molecular composition of an atmospheric region, a particular molecule or
molecules can be chosen for increased presence. For example, ozone, nitrogen, etc. concentrations in the
atmosphere could be artificially increased. Similarly, environmental enhancement could be
achieved by causing the breakup of
various chemical entities such as carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, nitrous
oxides, and the like. Transportation of entities can also be
realized when advantage is taken of the drag effects caused by regions of the
atmosphere moving up along diverging field lines. Small micron sized particles
can be then transported, and, under certain circumstances and with the
availability of sufficient energy, larger particles or objects could be
similarly affected. Particles with desired characteristics such as tackiness,
reflectivity, absorptivity, etc., can be transported
for specific purposes or effects. For example, a plume of tacky particles could
be established to increase the drag on a missile or satellite passing therethrough. Even plumes of plasma having substantially
less charged particle density than described above will produce drag effects on
missiles which will affect a lightweight (dummy) missile in a manner
substantially different than a heavy (live) missile and this affect can be used
to distinguish between the two types of missiles. A moving plume could also
serve as a means for supplying a space station or for focusing vast amount of sunlight on selected portions of the
earth. Surveys of global scope could also be realized because
the earth's natural magnetic field could be significantly altered in a
controlled manner by plasma beta effects resulting in, for example, improved magnetotelluric surveys. Electromagnetic pulse defenses are also possible. The earth's
magnetic field could be decreased or disrupted at appropriate altitudes to
modify or eliminate the magnetic field in high Compton electron generation
(e.g., from high altitude nuclear bursts) regions. High intensity, well
controlled electrical fields can be provided in selected locations for various
purposes. For example, the plasma
sheath surrounding a missile or satellite could be used as a trigger for
activating such a high intensity field to destroy the missile or satellite.
Further, irregularities can be created
in the ionosphere which will interfere with the normal operation of various
types of radar, e.g., synthetic aperture radar. The present
invention can also be used to create artificial belts of trapped particles
which in turn can be studied to determine the stability of such parties. Still
further, plumes in accordance with the present invention can be formed to
simulate and/or perform the same functions as performed by the detonation of a "heave" type nuclear device
without actually having to detonate such a device. Thus it can
be seen that the ramifications are numerous, far-reaching, and exceedingly
varied in usefulness.2
Confirmation
that recommendations from this Eastlund patent have
been attempted can be found in the HAARP BIBLIOGRAPHY 1990-2005 which
chronicles many of the research programs conducted with HAARP during that
period3
In regards to
research studies on bees, it has been determined that they are highly
sensitivity to electromagnetic interference - the following excerpts have been
compiled with links to many of these studies within the references:
"...when
proof was obtained that bees and other insects in electric fields show changes
in behavior and metabolism, the electrostatic charges on them acquired a new
significance."
…the perception of electric fields and also intra-specific communication
of social insects, and for “weather sensitivity” and orientation.
…Electrical
fields in the atmosphere, electromagnetic oscillations and atmospheric ions
have become established as meteorologically correlated factors in the insects’
habitat…
"The
body surface of a bee can be divided roughly into two areas as far as its
electrical behavior is concerned. All the membranous and glandular surfaces of
the cuticula show great variations in potential,
whereas the rest of the surface is at a low potential, up to +1 v. Over fairly
short distances, there may be fairly high intensities of electric field,
25v/0-2cm. These measurements show certain peculiarities:
(a) Static
potentials can be measured only from the antennae; elsewhere on the body there
is an effect analogous to the discharge of a condenser.
(b) A bee is
able to change the polarity of an antenna, completely or partly, in less than a
second. The change usually occurs just before take-off, suggesting perhaps that
this change of polarity has some function in orientation...
(c) The bee
is insulated electrically from any underlying surface by the claw of its tarsi,
but it can make electric contact with the surface by means of the electrolyte
secreted from the arolium. According to the sign and
magnitude of the potential of the underlying surface, the bee then becomes
either charged or discharged.
Every colony
as a whole shows a level of charge which is characteristic of it, depending on
the strength and the amounts of brood and honey in it,...Beyond
a (measurable) distance from the entrance, the electrical influence of the
colony ceases. On days when a colony has a negative potential, positively
charged bees returning to it change their potential from positive through zero
to a negative value during flight. On other days (when its potential is
positive) those bees that have a small positive
potential increase this more and more as they approach the colony.
It is
possible to record the arrival or departure of an individual bee, within a
suitable distance of the hive entrance, by recording the change in the
potential of the colony with a sufficiently sensitive instrument.
Bees in a
strong electric field became aggressive, stinging each other to death;
communication was disturbed. At still higher fields, the bees tore out the
brood from the cells, and no new brood was produced. The bees left their hive
if they could,...
Colonies
subjected to electromagnetic oscillations (10-30 kHz, 800 v/m)
produce a changed pattern of sounds and their temperature increases. Given a choice
bees will evade such oscillations.
Increase
concentration of atmospheric ions increases the motor activity and also affects
the water balance of the bees. Extensive electric screening of bees by a
Faraday cage reduces general activity and results in pathological loading of
the rectum.
If the ion
concentration of the air is high, peak discharge currents of about 10 x 108
A may occur at the antenna; these are sufficiently high to produce
physiological excitement.
Some types of
behavior can be correlated with atmospheric electrical factors. The level of
electrical potential affects the ability of bees to imbibe food. It also
affects the onset and course of the flight of young bees from the hive and also
aggressivity. The fact that the bees ability to return
to their home or hive varies from time to time can be attributed to atmospheric
disturbances (electromagnetic oscillations in the long-wavelength range).
Changes in
weather and cloud formation are associated with changes in electric potential,
which produce local changes of charge both in the individual bee and in the
colony, and this could account for the bees 'recognition' of the dynamics
course of weather changes. Corona discharge due to high atmospheric field
intensities (for example from the tips of grasses and leaves) must also be
taken into account: they might produce a UV pattern visible to the bees which,
being unstable in time, could confuse their orientation."4
Tethered honey bees (Apidea Apis melifera) coaxed to fly in a miniature wind tunnel for
a specific time interval, adsorb a virus (i.e., bacteriophage
MS2) aerosol at a linear rate of 1% of the aerosol concentration for every 6.73
pC of electrostatic charge on the bee.5
Bees have a magnetoreception
system sensitive down to 26nT at 10 to 60Hz and are more sensitive to lower
frequencies.6
Magnetic field (MF) bursts at a frequency of 250 Hz
oriented parallel to the field-lines of the EMF induce unequivocaljumpsof misdirection of up to +10°.7
Honey bees
can be influenced non-thermally in three ways:
First of all,
the bee itself is a creature with a strictly defined shape. So this shape can
be resonantly stimulated, when the wave-length - and so the frequency - of the
radiation is in the range of the size of the bee, As the honey bees' size is
circa two centimeters, the frequency of the resonance has to be up to 15
GHz. But Honey bees can not only be resonantly stimulated by this strict
frequency. Because their body is extensive, can can be stimulated by a broadband of frequencies,
which borders have to be discovered experimentally. ... 9
In an
experiment with exposing bee colonies to cordless phone base stations compared
to a control group of non-exposed colonies, in monitoring their return times to
the hive: "At no time of the experiment more than six exposed bees
arrived, several times none came back to the hive within 45 minutes, whereas at
every sequence of the experiment returning non-exposed honey bees could be
observed."10
Conclusion:
The combined research on electrical interference on the colonies and individual
bee's while not exhaustive indicates that changes even in one of the various
fields; such as ionization, ion polarity, UV corona discharge, magnetic field,
low frequency interference or high frequency resonance can have profound
effects on an insect that is A) dependent on the colony for survival and B)
must move in a x-y-z axis to not only find food but also be able to
navigate back to the same colony, a disorientation of a few degrees
horizontally or vertically can cause the returning bee to misalign, unlikely to
find the colony. This reminds me of aircraft trying to find an aircraft carrier
with only a general idea of the location, except in the case of the aircraft
pilot's they know the ship will be at sea level whereas a bee colony can be
located 30 feet up in a tree so the z axis orientation also becomes critical.
If HAARP is influencing one or more of these required fields - which both the
patent and research seems to indicate - then it may not only be disorienting
the bees' but also making them more vulnerable to viruses and infection which
is showing up in those bees that remain at the hives which collapse.
I recommend
that all ionospheric heater arrays around the world
be turned completely off for 6-12 months to see if the colonies continue to
collapse. This will determine if the connection between CCD and HAARP and other
related arrays around the world is valid. This is one of the few cases where an
off switch can be flipped to determine a possible cause and effect relationship
over such a wide area.
References:
1) Russian parliament concerned about
US plans to develop new weapon
http://www.fas.org/irp/program/collect/haarp-duma.htm
2) United
States Patent #4,686,605 Inventor: Eastlund; Bernard J. Method and apparatus for
altering a region in the earth's atmosphere, ionosphere, and/or magnetosphere http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=4,686,605.PN.&OS=PN/4,686,605&RS=PN/4,686,605
3) HAARP
BIBLIOGRAPHY 1990-2005
http://www.gi.alaska.edu/services/library/haarpbibliography.html
4) Effect of
Electrical Charges on Honeybees, By Ulrich Warnke,
Bee World, Vol. 57, No. 2 1976 http://www.hese-project.org/hese-uk/en/papers/warnke_bee_world_76.pdf
5) Flying
honey bees adsorb airborne viruses
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/klu/aero/2005/00000021/00000002/00004185?crawler=true
6)
Measurement of the threshold sensitivity of honeybees to weak, extremely
low-frequency magnetic fields, Kirschvink J, Padmanabha S, Boyce C, Oglesby J. 1: J Exp Biol. 1997;200(Pt 9):1363-8.
http://jeb.biologists.org/cgi/reprint/200/9/1363
7) Bursts of magnetic fields
induce jumps of misdirection in bees by a mechanism of magnetic resonance
http://www.springerlink.com/content/v6406173767q7445/
8) Magnetic
field effects on activity and ageing in honeybees
http://www.springerlink.com/content/w47v20v257pq8076/
9) How
Electromagnetic Exposure can influence Learning Processes (of bees)
http://www.bienenarchiv.de/forschung/2004_lernprozesse/Electromagnetic%20Exposure_Learning%20Processes.doc.pdf
10) Can Electromagnetic Exposure Cause
a Change in Behaviour?
http://www.hese-project.org/hese-uk/en/papers/icrw_kuhn_landau_study.pdf
About the
Author
Guy Cramer is the President/CEO of
HyperStealth
Biotechnology Corp, President of
United Dynamics Corp., inventor of the
Passive Negative Ion Generator, and the
developer of the
SuperForce.com algorithm. Guy has worked
with and/or corresponded on projects with, the Edmonton Oilers
National Hockey League team, NASA JPL, NASA Headquarters, Columbia Accident
Investigation Board, U.S. Marine Corps,
U.S. Army and Senator John Warner's office (Chairman of the Armed Services
Committee) prior to his retirement a few months ago. Mr. Cramer is also the grandson and former research assistant of Donald
L. Hings, P.Eng, M.B.E., C.M.
(Geophysicist), the developer of the first true
Walkie-Talkie in 1937 who
later refined the device into the "Radio Frequency System" for the
Canadian Military 1942; this earned him the prestigious Member of British
Empire Award, and The Order of Canada. Don Hings and
Guy Cramer authored an academic paper on greenhouse gasses for the head of the
United Nations Environmental Program in 1990.
In 1993 Guy
discovered that the Russian's had
secretly been using negative ion generators
to train their top athletes; vastly improving balance, endurance and reaction
time over normal levels, the Olympic committee did not object to these Russian
method's. With Cramer's 1999 invention of the Passive Negative Ion Generator -
he had developed a safe negative ion emission personal device with no power
source which provides similar advantages to the expensive Russian system at
little cost - currently he has combined the device into the collar of combat
uniforms which use his fractal camouflage patterns.
In the 1997
Cramer spearheaded a group to disprove the Bible Codes with a statistical
formula developed by Cramer. Many of the leading mathematicians were convinced
these codes were mathematically significant until Cramer's group proved that
they were common, random codes.
In 1997 one
of Cramer's papers was reviewed by world renown
Professor Stephen Hawking.
In 2003 Guy was
commissioned by King Abdullah II of Jordan to develop a
digital camouflage pattern that surpassed current U.S. issued uniforms.
The King has approved this KA2 pattern for Jordanian Armed Forces and Police
and printed over 500,000 uniforms with this pattern. Guy has since developed
over 3,000 digital camouflage patterns, many based on fractals
(feedback loops) with his partner
Lt. Col. Timothy R. O'Neill, Ph.D. (U.S. Army, Ret.),
who is considered to be the world expert on camouflage.
In 2003 Cramer submitted special
confidential information to the head of the Columbia Accident Investigation
Board regarding highly charged ion propagation in the atmosphere during a
previous Shuttle landing. In 2004-2005 Cramer corresponded with Frederick
Gregory, Deputy Administrator of NASA, regarding safety concerns for the launch
and landing of the Space Shuttle Discovery and increased geomagnetic
disturbances. It appears that Cramer’s recommendations to avoid a landing
trajectory over the continental United States, where high altitude ionosphere
lightning had a much greater potential, were heeded, as the landing site and
alternative landing sites NASA selected took place over the most minimal land
areas available within the variable orbit trajectories to use. This
decision was unprecedented in previous Shuttle landings. Cramer’s research
combined with new NASA research concluded that high altitude positive
lightning, which the shuttle is not protected against, is not as rare as NASA
had suspected and it is predominant over land and rare over the ocean.
In 2004, a visual mitigation study
was spearheaded by the U.S. Department of the Interior's (DOI) Bureau of Land
Management (BLM). This is the most comprehensive infrastructure
concealment program since World War II using specially designed "Fractal
Based" camouflage patterns in projects related to concealment of critical
infrastructure. It produced remarkable results. The design team of
Dr. O'Neill, and Mr. Guy Cramer continues to achieve
desired objectives as the study nears publication and implementation across
DOI/BLM administered lands within the United
States in 2007.
Cramer is now developing a method
with Dr. O’Neill to place complex digital camouflage patterns onto supersonic
aircraft as a labor efficient and cost effective system
while also combining new IR and Thermal signature reduction paint into the
application. In 2006 the country of Jordan has used
part of this system to place Cramer's digital pattern on over 3000 military
vehicles. Also in 2006 parts of this method for the commercial market have been
used for a Cellular Tower company to
conceal two communication towers in environmental sensitive areas on the East
coast of the United States, the visual
mitigation results have been endorsed by the regulators. In 2007 this same Cellular Tower company has now licensed HyperStealth
camouflage patterns for use on any cellular tower across the United
States.
This material is Copyright © 2007, by
Guy Cramer, All Rights Reserved.
This material cannot be reproduced in any form without the expressed written
permission of the Author. Whole Copies may be printed for personal use; no
changes are to be made to the content, names or references.
http://www.hyperstealth.com/haarp/index.htm